Wszystkie zgłoszenia
Zgłoszenia Saint Petersburg
#47769: "no need to be sorted when cards flip."
inforequest: Programiści chcieliby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat tej propozycji
O czym jest to zgłoszenie?
Co się stało? Wybierz z poniższych opcji
Propozycja: moim zdaniem, następujące rzeczy bardzo poprawiłyby implementację gry
Szczegółowy opis
• Wyjaśnij swoją propozycję precyzyjnie i zwięźle, tak aby jak najłatwiej zrozumieć, co masz na myśli.
when cards appear, cards are sorted.
but, I want to know who caused to flip 18 aristocrat on aristocrat phase.
I suggest not to be sorted when cards flip.• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v92
Historia zgłoszeń
2021 wrz 4 12:06 • Faceman255 • Ta propozycja nie została jeszcze przeanalizowana przez programistów:
It makes the game more interesting.
2021 wrz 4 18:38 • Inaofr • Programiści chcieliby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat tej propozycji:
So you want drawn cards to be placed on the board in the order they were drawn?
If yes I think most players would dislike it, in my view it is easier to evaluate your next move then cards are sorted. I do not really understand what more you would know if the cards were not sorted.
If yes I think most players would dislike it, in my view it is easier to evaluate your next move then cards are sorted. I do not really understand what more you would know if the cards were not sorted.
2021 wrz 14 15:29 • debjwillis • Programiści chcieliby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat tej propozycji:
I agree. I often wonder what the order is of the cards that come up in the next phase so I can better determine the effects of previous actions. Perhaps there's a way to first show the order that the cards came up in when beginning the new phase, and then provide a button where the player could autosort the cards by value when they are ready to do so?
2021 wrz 27 10:13 • Faceman255 • Programiści chcieliby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat tej propozycji:
Yes, I think cards should be placed on the board in the order they were drawn.
2022 cze 1 4:07 • Faceman255 • Programiści chcieliby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat tej propozycji:
In this game, mistress on the 1st round is very important.
In my opinion, arist 4th starter should not flip 4th arist.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know who caused to flip mistress.
On the other situation, we sometimes take the meaningless card to flip more UG cards.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know whether the playing worked.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, the game becomes more interesting.
If real play, we can know it.
In my opinion, arist 4th starter should not flip 4th arist.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know who caused to flip mistress.
On the other situation, we sometimes take the meaningless card to flip more UG cards.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, we can know whether the playing worked.
If flipped cards are placed on the board in the order, the game becomes more interesting.
If real play, we can know it.
2022 cze 1 4:15 • Faceman255 • Programiści chcieliby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat tej propozycji:
the reason why take meaningless card to flip more UG cards, to flip UG arist.
it sometimes happens at the last round.
it sometimes happens at the last round.
2022 cze 1 4:34 • Faceman255 • Programiści chcieliby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat tej propozycji:
it is a problem that we can't know the information that we can know at the real game.
2024 cze 7 13:57 • bananasplay • Programiści chcieliby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat tej propozycji:
As debjwillis writes, one benefit of knowing the order of cards drawn is to ascertain the effects of previous actions. If one, for example, purchases or reserves a card in a given phase, one more card is drawn in the next phase—/which/ card, however, remains a mystery in the current implementation because the cards are automatically sorted. But if the cards were instead shown in the order drawn, the "extra" card would be obvious.
I've upvoted this suggestion, but I think that it should be implemented as a player's preference, with the default setting corresponding to the way the game currently operates, so as to provide no disruption to all players who are used to the current functionality.
Alternatively, if the log were to indicate which cards are drawn—one card per log entry in the order drawn—I think that that would be an acceptable alternative to implementing a player's preference.
I've upvoted this suggestion, but I think that it should be implemented as a player's preference, with the default setting corresponding to the way the game currently operates, so as to provide no disruption to all players who are used to the current functionality.
Alternatively, if the log were to indicate which cards are drawn—one card per log entry in the order drawn—I think that that would be an acceptable alternative to implementing a player's preference.
2024 cze 14 18:43 • TaxMan5x • Programiści chcieliby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat tej propozycji:
It's an interesting suggestion, but it reminds me of "chasing the rabbit" in hold em poker. While it's interesting to see if your choice was the correct one, it won't (or shouldn't) change your mind about that prior choice. Beyond self-validation, it doesn't really add anything to the game or your strategy.
Dodaj coś do tego zgłoszenia
Dodaj tutaj wszystko, co wydaje się istotne dla odtworzenia tego błędu lub zrozumienia twojej propozycji:
- Kolejne ID stołu / ID ruchu
- Czy F5 rozwiązało problem?
- Czy problem zdarzył się kilka razy? Za każdym razem? Losowo?
- Jeżeli masz zrzut ekranu z tym błędem (dobry zwyczaj) możesz użyć Imgur.com, żeby wrzucić go do Internetu i potem skopiować łącze do niego tutaj.
