#44292: "Log when infection discard pile is shuffled and placed back onto deck + count of cards"
O czym jest to zgłoszenie?
Co się stało? Wybierz z poniższych opcji
Co się stało? Wybierz z poniższych opcji
Sprawdź, czy istnieje już zgłoszenie na ten sam temat
Jeśli tak, ZAGŁOSUJ na to zgłoszenie. Zgłoszenia z największą liczbą głosów mają najwyższy PRIORYTET!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Szczegółowy opis
• Proszę skopiować i wkleić treść błędu wyświetloną na ekranie, o ile jakaś się pojawia.
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
Therfore this idea has two parts:
1. The core suggestion: Logging how many cards were just shuffled onto the discard would benefit this.
2. As an extension to this: Logging for easy reference which infection cards were just shuffled and placed upon the deck allows for better decision-making, especially at higher difficulty.
The extension may seem contentious about whether it's really okay to do or offers to much information, I offer the following thoughts on this:
1. Make it optional for this to be logged? I'd say this is FAR more relevant for turn-based games than real-time. Having this as a game setup option allows a group to decide if they want this level of information.
2. When playing this game in real life collectively the players are able to generally remember what just got shuffled and placed atop the infection draw pile; this in my opinion is a QoL improvement to bring parity between IRL games and digital.
It also occurred in the writeup of this a potential solution to this problem is actually just bringing players back to the table before step three of an Epidemic card is resolved, and allowing them a chance to view the discard right before it's shuffled. I will log this as a seperate idea so it may be voted on independantly.• Proszę opisać co chciałeś zrobić, co zrobiłeś i co się stało
• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v91
• Proszę skopiować i wkleić tekst wyświetlany w języku angielskim zamiast w twoim języku. Jeżeli masz zrzut ekranu z tym błędem (dobry zwyczaj) możesz użyć Imgur.com, żeby wrzucić go do Internetu i potem skopiować łącze do niego tutaj.
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
Therfore this idea has two parts:
1. The core suggestion: Logging how many cards were just shuffled onto the discard would benefit this.
2. As an extension to this: Logging for easy reference which infection cards were just shuffled and placed upon the deck allows for better decision-making, especially at higher difficulty.
The extension may seem contentious about whether it's really okay to do or offers to much information, I offer the following thoughts on this:
1. Make it optional for this to be logged? I'd say this is FAR more relevant for turn-based games than real-time. Having this as a game setup option allows a group to decide if they want this level of information.
2. When playing this game in real life collectively the players are able to generally remember what just got shuffled and placed atop the infection draw pile; this in my opinion is a QoL improvement to bring parity between IRL games and digital.
It also occurred in the writeup of this a potential solution to this problem is actually just bringing players back to the table before step three of an Epidemic card is resolved, and allowing them a chance to view the discard right before it's shuffled. I will log this as a seperate idea so it may be voted on independantly.• Czy ten tekst jest dostępny w systemie tłumaczeń? Jeśli tak, to czy został przetłumaczony więcej niż 24 godziny temu?
• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v91
• Wyjaśnij swoją propozycję precyzyjnie i zwięźle, tak aby jak najłatwiej zrozumieć, co masz na myśli.
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
Therfore this idea has two parts:
1. The core suggestion: Logging how many cards were just shuffled onto the discard would benefit this.
2. As an extension to this: Logging for easy reference which infection cards were just shuffled and placed upon the deck allows for better decision-making, especially at higher difficulty.
The extension may seem contentious about whether it's really okay to do or offers to much information, I offer the following thoughts on this:
1. Make it optional for this to be logged? I'd say this is FAR more relevant for turn-based games than real-time. Having this as a game setup option allows a group to decide if they want this level of information.
2. When playing this game in real life collectively the players are able to generally remember what just got shuffled and placed atop the infection draw pile; this in my opinion is a QoL improvement to bring parity between IRL games and digital.
It also occurred in the writeup of this a potential solution to this problem is actually just bringing players back to the table before step three of an Epidemic card is resolved, and allowing them a chance to view the discard right before it's shuffled. I will log this as a seperate idea so it may be voted on independantly.• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v91
• Co wyświetlało się na ekranie kiedy zostałeś zablokowany (Pusty ekran? Część interfejsu gry? Komunikat o błędzie?)
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
Therfore this idea has two parts:
1. The core suggestion: Logging how many cards were just shuffled onto the discard would benefit this.
2. As an extension to this: Logging for easy reference which infection cards were just shuffled and placed upon the deck allows for better decision-making, especially at higher difficulty.
The extension may seem contentious about whether it's really okay to do or offers to much information, I offer the following thoughts on this:
1. Make it optional for this to be logged? I'd say this is FAR more relevant for turn-based games than real-time. Having this as a game setup option allows a group to decide if they want this level of information.
2. When playing this game in real life collectively the players are able to generally remember what just got shuffled and placed atop the infection draw pile; this in my opinion is a QoL improvement to bring parity between IRL games and digital.
It also occurred in the writeup of this a potential solution to this problem is actually just bringing players back to the table before step three of an Epidemic card is resolved, and allowing them a chance to view the discard right before it's shuffled. I will log this as a seperate idea so it may be voted on independantly.• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v91
• Która z zasad gry nie była przestrzegana w adaptacji BGA
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
Therfore this idea has two parts:
1. The core suggestion: Logging how many cards were just shuffled onto the discard would benefit this.
2. As an extension to this: Logging for easy reference which infection cards were just shuffled and placed upon the deck allows for better decision-making, especially at higher difficulty.
The extension may seem contentious about whether it's really okay to do or offers to much information, I offer the following thoughts on this:
1. Make it optional for this to be logged? I'd say this is FAR more relevant for turn-based games than real-time. Having this as a game setup option allows a group to decide if they want this level of information.
2. When playing this game in real life collectively the players are able to generally remember what just got shuffled and placed atop the infection draw pile; this in my opinion is a QoL improvement to bring parity between IRL games and digital.
It also occurred in the writeup of this a potential solution to this problem is actually just bringing players back to the table before step three of an Epidemic card is resolved, and allowing them a chance to view the discard right before it's shuffled. I will log this as a seperate idea so it may be voted on independantly.• Czy naruszenie zasad gry jest widoczne w powtórce rozgrywki? Jeżeli tak, to w ruchu o jakim numerze?
• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v91
• Jaką akcję w grze chciałeś wykonać?
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
Therfore this idea has two parts:
1. The core suggestion: Logging how many cards were just shuffled onto the discard would benefit this.
2. As an extension to this: Logging for easy reference which infection cards were just shuffled and placed upon the deck allows for better decision-making, especially at higher difficulty.
The extension may seem contentious about whether it's really okay to do or offers to much information, I offer the following thoughts on this:
1. Make it optional for this to be logged? I'd say this is FAR more relevant for turn-based games than real-time. Having this as a game setup option allows a group to decide if they want this level of information.
2. When playing this game in real life collectively the players are able to generally remember what just got shuffled and placed atop the infection draw pile; this in my opinion is a QoL improvement to bring parity between IRL games and digital.
It also occurred in the writeup of this a potential solution to this problem is actually just bringing players back to the table before step three of an Epidemic card is resolved, and allowing them a chance to view the discard right before it's shuffled. I will log this as a seperate idea so it may be voted on independantly.• Co starasz się zrobić by uruchomić tę akcję w grze?
• Co się stało kiedy próbowałeś to zrobić (komunikat o błędzie, komunikat na pasku stanu gry, ...)?
• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v91
• W którym momencie gry pojawił się problem (jakie było aktualne polecenie w grze)?
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
Therfore this idea has two parts:
1. The core suggestion: Logging how many cards were just shuffled onto the discard would benefit this.
2. As an extension to this: Logging for easy reference which infection cards were just shuffled and placed upon the deck allows for better decision-making, especially at higher difficulty.
The extension may seem contentious about whether it's really okay to do or offers to much information, I offer the following thoughts on this:
1. Make it optional for this to be logged? I'd say this is FAR more relevant for turn-based games than real-time. Having this as a game setup option allows a group to decide if they want this level of information.
2. When playing this game in real life collectively the players are able to generally remember what just got shuffled and placed atop the infection draw pile; this in my opinion is a QoL improvement to bring parity between IRL games and digital.
It also occurred in the writeup of this a potential solution to this problem is actually just bringing players back to the table before step three of an Epidemic card is resolved, and allowing them a chance to view the discard right before it's shuffled. I will log this as a seperate idea so it may be voted on independantly.• Co się stało kiedy próbowałeś wykonać akcję w grze (komunikat o błędzie, komunikat na pasku stanu gry, ...)?
• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v91
• Proszę opisać problem z wyświetlaniem. Jeżeli masz zrzut ekranu z tym błędem (dobry zwyczaj) możesz użyć Imgur.com, żeby wrzucić go do Internetu i potem skopiować łącze do niego tutaj.
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
Therfore this idea has two parts:
1. The core suggestion: Logging how many cards were just shuffled onto the discard would benefit this.
2. As an extension to this: Logging for easy reference which infection cards were just shuffled and placed upon the deck allows for better decision-making, especially at higher difficulty.
The extension may seem contentious about whether it's really okay to do or offers to much information, I offer the following thoughts on this:
1. Make it optional for this to be logged? I'd say this is FAR more relevant for turn-based games than real-time. Having this as a game setup option allows a group to decide if they want this level of information.
2. When playing this game in real life collectively the players are able to generally remember what just got shuffled and placed atop the infection draw pile; this in my opinion is a QoL improvement to bring parity between IRL games and digital.
It also occurred in the writeup of this a potential solution to this problem is actually just bringing players back to the table before step three of an Epidemic card is resolved, and allowing them a chance to view the discard right before it's shuffled. I will log this as a seperate idea so it may be voted on independantly.• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v91
• Proszę skopiować i wkleić tekst wyświetlany w języku angielskim zamiast w twoim języku. Jeżeli masz zrzut ekranu z tym błędem (dobry zwyczaj) możesz użyć Imgur.com, żeby wrzucić go do Internetu i potem skopiować łącze do niego tutaj.
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
Therfore this idea has two parts:
1. The core suggestion: Logging how many cards were just shuffled onto the discard would benefit this.
2. As an extension to this: Logging for easy reference which infection cards were just shuffled and placed upon the deck allows for better decision-making, especially at higher difficulty.
The extension may seem contentious about whether it's really okay to do or offers to much information, I offer the following thoughts on this:
1. Make it optional for this to be logged? I'd say this is FAR more relevant for turn-based games than real-time. Having this as a game setup option allows a group to decide if they want this level of information.
2. When playing this game in real life collectively the players are able to generally remember what just got shuffled and placed atop the infection draw pile; this in my opinion is a QoL improvement to bring parity between IRL games and digital.
It also occurred in the writeup of this a potential solution to this problem is actually just bringing players back to the table before step three of an Epidemic card is resolved, and allowing them a chance to view the discard right before it's shuffled. I will log this as a seperate idea so it may be voted on independantly.• Czy ten tekst jest dostępny w systemie tłumaczeń? Jeśli tak, to czy został przetłumaczony więcej niż 24 godziny temu?
• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v91
• Wyjaśnij swoją propozycję precyzyjnie i zwięźle, tak aby jak najłatwiej zrozumieć, co masz na myśli.
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
Therfore this idea has two parts:
1. The core suggestion: Logging how many cards were just shuffled onto the discard would benefit this.
2. As an extension to this: Logging for easy reference which infection cards were just shuffled and placed upon the deck allows for better decision-making, especially at higher difficulty.
The extension may seem contentious about whether it's really okay to do or offers to much information, I offer the following thoughts on this:
1. Make it optional for this to be logged? I'd say this is FAR more relevant for turn-based games than real-time. Having this as a game setup option allows a group to decide if they want this level of information.
2. When playing this game in real life collectively the players are able to generally remember what just got shuffled and placed atop the infection draw pile; this in my opinion is a QoL improvement to bring parity between IRL games and digital.
It also occurred in the writeup of this a potential solution to this problem is actually just bringing players back to the table before step three of an Epidemic card is resolved, and allowing them a chance to view the discard right before it's shuffled. I will log this as a seperate idea so it may be voted on independantly.• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v91
Historia zgłoszeń
======CURRENT LOG======
[Replay last moves]
[Cube] on Baghdad
[Cube] on Baghdad
[Cube] on Baghdad
Infection in Baghdad
Infection Rate is increasing
New Epidemic!
Dispatcher receives Miami
Dispatcher draws 2 card(s)
======SUGGESTED LOG======
[Replay last moves]
7 Infection cards placed on top of infection deck
Infection discard was shuffled.
[Cube] on Baghdad
[Cube] on Baghdad
[Cube] on Baghdad
Infection in Baghdad
Infection Rate is increasing
New Epidemic!
Dispatcher receives Miami
Dispatcher draws 2 card(s)
======EXAMPLE FOR EXTENDED IDEA ======
[Replay last moves]
7 Infection cards placed on top of infection deck
Infection discard was shuffled.
Contents of the infection discard pile:
1. Baghdad
2. Example
3. Example
4. Example
5. Example
6. Example
7. Example
[Cube] on Baghdad
[Cube] on Baghdad
[Cube] on Baghdad
Infection in Baghdad
Infection Rate is increasing
New Epidemic!
Dispatcher receives Miami
Dispatcher draws 2 card(s)
Both are in service of allowing more information to turn-based players about what was in the discard pile that just got shuffled as this information is easily missed.
In a game played IRL we will always use the privilege provided to us by the rules ("Players may freely examine either discard pile at any time") to ensure we know, and then track what is being shuffled and placed on the Infection draw pile
Dodaj coś do tego zgłoszenia
- Kolejne ID stołu / ID ruchu
- Czy F5 rozwiązało problem?
- Czy problem zdarzył się kilka razy? Za każdym razem? Losowo?
- Jeżeli masz zrzut ekranu z tym błędem (dobry zwyczaj) możesz użyć Imgur.com, żeby wrzucić go do Internetu i potem skopiować łącze do niego tutaj.