• Proszę skopiować i wkleić treść błędu wyświetloną na ekranie, o ile jakaś się pojawia.

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Proszę opisać co chciałeś zrobić, co zrobiłeś i co się stało

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?

• Proszę skopiować i wkleić tekst wyświetlany w języku angielskim zamiast w twoim języku. Jeśli posiadasz zrzut ekranu przedstawiający ten błąd (dobra praktyka), możesz skorzystać z wybranej przez siebie usługi hostującej zdjęcia (np. snipboard.io), aby go przesłać, a następnie skopiuj i wklej link tutaj. Czy ten tekst jest dostępny w systemie tłumaczeń? Jeśli tak, to czy został przetłumaczony więcej niż 24 godziny temu?

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?

• Wyjaśnij swoją propozycję precyzyjnie i zwięźle, tak aby jak najłatwiej zrozumieć, co masz na myśli.

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?

• Co wyświetlało się na ekranie kiedy zostałeś zablokowany (Pusty ekran? Część interfejsu gry? Komunikat o błędzie?)

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?

• Która z zasad gry nie była przestrzegana w adaptacji BGA

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Czy naruszenie zasad gry jest widoczne w powtórce rozgrywki? Jeżeli tak, to w ruchu o jakim numerze?

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?

• Jaką akcję w grze chciałeś wykonać?

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Co starasz się zrobić by uruchomić tę akcję w grze?

• Co się stało kiedy próbowałeś to zrobić (komunikat o błędzie, komunikat na pasku stanu gry, ...)?

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?

• W którym momencie gry pojawił się problem (jakie było aktualne polecenie w grze)?

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Co się stało kiedy próbowałeś wykonać akcję w grze (komunikat o błędzie, komunikat na pasku stanu gry, ...)?

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?

• Proszę opisać problem z wyświetlaniem. Jeśli posiadasz zrzut ekranu przedstawiający ten błąd (dobra praktyka), możesz skorzystać z wybranej przez siebie usługi hostującej zdjęcia (np. snipboard.io), aby go przesłać, a następnie skopiuj i wklej link tutaj.

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?

• Proszę skopiować i wkleić tekst wyświetlany w języku angielskim zamiast w twoim języku. Jeśli posiadasz zrzut ekranu przedstawiający ten błąd (dobra praktyka), możesz skorzystać z wybranej przez siebie usługi hostującej zdjęcia (np. snipboard.io), aby go przesłać, a następnie skopiuj i wklej link tutaj. Czy ten tekst jest dostępny w systemie tłumaczeń? Jeśli tak, to czy został przetłumaczony więcej niż 24 godziny temu?

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?

• Wyjaśnij swoją propozycję precyzyjnie i zwięźle, tak aby jak najłatwiej zrozumieć, co masz na myśli.

This game is meant to be simultaneous and there is nothing in the rules to push people into playing differently than the others.
Because of that, there are many situations where one play is objectively better than others and we really shouldn't see what the other players have done before we have committed our turn.
As I see it, there are 3 options here:
1) See what the others have done once you have done your own turn and don't allow people to cancel their turn (similar to what is done in railroad ink)
2) See what the others have done only once everyone has done his turn (and then you can and indeed should let players redo their turn as long as someone hasn't completed his, similar to what you have in Dice Hospital : Emergency Room)
3) The overkill option: lets player chose whether they want option 1 or option 2 as a player option. (I don't think any game does that no BGA)

On balance, I think that option 2 is better for turn-based games and both are rather equivalent for real-time games.

In the game I linked, #16, there is a clear superior play for most players. I didn't need to copy anyone to find it but I *was* able to see what Aladin had done which would have reminded me of that coup if I had not seen it.

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?