Wszystkie zgłoszenia
Zgłoszenia Space Base
#63467: "Random Number generator"
rejected: Programiści uważają, że nie jest to dobry pomysł lub że stosunek kosztów do korzyści jest zbyt wysoki
6
O czym jest to zgłoszenie?
Co się stało? Wybierz z poniższych opcji
Propozycja: moim zdaniem, następujące rzeczy bardzo poprawiłyby implementację gry
Szczegółowy opis
• Wyjaśnij swoją propozycję precyzyjnie i zwięźle, tak aby jak najłatwiej zrozumieć, co masz na myśli.
The random number generator for this game does not seem to work properly. If you roll 2d6 (two normal dice), the probabilities for each number are weighted most toward the middle numbers, six(13.89%), seven (16.67%), and eight (13.89%). This means that 44.45% of the time, the dice should equal one of those three numbers. After more than 80 plays of this game, I can tell you that there is no way those percentages are holding up. What appears to be happening is an even chance (9.09%) of rolling each number from 2 through 12, rather than the proper spread we should be seeing. The end result is an overwhelming amount of rolls away from what should be the most commonly rolled numbers.• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v100
Historia zgłoszeń
2022 kwi 25 4:10 • Talon378 • Ta propozycja nie została jeszcze przeanalizowana przez programistów:
This is occurring in every game I play of this game. The lack of compliance to what should be the proper probabilities for the spread of rolls means that the strategy of the game is altered and becomes MUCH more random.
2022 maj 6 7:05 • Rick_M • Ta propozycja nie została jeszcze przeanalizowana przez programistów:
I also sense that the dice rolls are not random. We just played 4 games and (1)(2) roll was much too frequent. I remember the first time I played and rolled 4 elevens in a row to start the game. I'd run some stats on the dice, but capturing the data from a game would be much too tedious.
Also, we had the same 4 players and selected replay option. The game displays message saying that player order is randomized, but we were in same order each game.
Also, we had the same 4 players and selected replay option. The game displays message saying that player order is randomized, but we were in same order each game.
2022 maj 9 2:01 • Talon378 • Ta propozycja nie została jeszcze przeanalizowana przez programistów:
Table #265890439
I had purchased sectors and set my board up to give me victory points any time I rolled a 7 or above. I rolled victory points once, and has to spend a cube to move to victory points a second time. It is ridiculous that in 50+ turns I could not roll a 7 or above. Fix your dice roller!
I had purchased sectors and set my board up to give me victory points any time I rolled a 7 or above. I rolled victory points once, and has to spend a cube to move to victory points a second time. It is ridiculous that in 50+ turns I could not roll a 7 or above. Fix your dice roller!
2022 cze 21 20:06 • Biking Gamer • Ta propozycja nie została jeszcze przeanalizowana przez programistów:
I concur - the dice rolls on this game (and others) does not appear random. I recommend using the milliseconds on clock time as a seed for your random number generator -- that should produce more random results.
2023 lut 10 16:29 • Andrew C-137 • Ta propozycja nie została jeszcze przeanalizowana przez programistów:
@ Rick_M
A simple solution for tracking dice throws is already there. All that needs to change with the stats at the end is to breakout a second column so that you can see the occurrences of single die results, then the second column shows "Two-Die" results. Right now having them combined is meaningless, but to see those separately, along with a total column at the end, will give you easily scrapeable data. One game of course won't be enough (anyone who's played roulette and seen a run of 50 reds knows what I'm talking about), and you'll have to extrapolate for 1's and 12 over 2 and 6's, but seeing that data over dozens of games might help people see if it's truly close to random.
A simple solution for tracking dice throws is already there. All that needs to change with the stats at the end is to breakout a second column so that you can see the occurrences of single die results, then the second column shows "Two-Die" results. Right now having them combined is meaningless, but to see those separately, along with a total column at the end, will give you easily scrapeable data. One game of course won't be enough (anyone who's played roulette and seen a run of 50 reds knows what I'm talking about), and you'll have to extrapolate for 1's and 12 over 2 and 6's, but seeing that data over dozens of games might help people see if it's truly close to random.
2023 lut 12 16:18 • Shazzypaz • Programiści uważają, że nie jest to dobry pomysł lub że stosunek kosztów do korzyści jest zbyt wysoki:
Developers are instructed to use the bga_rand() function, no flexibility to use another function. If you are concerned about the randomness, please upvote boardgamearena.com/bug?id=72077.
2023 kwi 7 1:40 • Antstad • Programiści uważają, że nie jest to dobry pomysł lub że stosunek kosztów do korzyści jest zbyt wysoki:
Just upvoted. I sware it's getting worse on the site.
Dodaj coś do tego zgłoszenia
Dodaj tutaj wszystko, co wydaje się istotne dla odtworzenia tego błędu lub zrozumienia twojej propozycji:
- Kolejne ID stołu / ID ruchu
- Czy F5 rozwiązało problem?
- Czy problem zdarzył się kilka razy? Za każdym razem? Losowo?
- Jeżeli masz zrzut ekranu z tym błędem (dobry zwyczaj) możesz użyć Imgur.com, żeby wrzucić go do Internetu i potem skopiować łącze do niego tutaj.
