• Proszę skopiować i wkleić treść błędu wyświetloną na ekranie, o ile jakaś się pojawia.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Proszę opisać co chciałeś zrobić, co zrobiłeś i co się stało

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?

• Proszę skopiować i wkleić tekst wyświetlany w języku angielskim zamiast w twoim języku. Jeżeli masz zrzut ekranu z tym błędem (dobry zwyczaj) możesz użyć Imgur.com, żeby wrzucić go do Internetu i potem skopiować łącze do niego tutaj.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Czy ten tekst jest dostępny w systemie tłumaczeń? Jeśli tak, to czy został przetłumaczony więcej niż 24 godziny temu?

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?

• Wyjaśnij swoją propozycję precyzyjnie i zwięźle, tak aby jak najłatwiej zrozumieć, co masz na myśli.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?

• Co wyświetlało się na ekranie kiedy zostałeś zablokowany (Pusty ekran? Część interfejsu gry? Komunikat o błędzie?)

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?

• Która z zasad gry nie była przestrzegana w adaptacji BGA

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Czy naruszenie zasad gry jest widoczne w powtórce rozgrywki? Jeżeli tak, to w ruchu o jakim numerze?

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?

• Jaką akcję w grze chciałeś wykonać?

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Co starasz się zrobić by uruchomić tę akcję w grze?

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• Co się stało kiedy próbowałeś to zrobić (komunikat o błędzie, komunikat na pasku stanu gry, ...)?

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?

• W którym momencie gry pojawił się problem (jakie było aktualne polecenie w grze)?

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Co się stało kiedy próbowałeś wykonać akcję w grze (komunikat o błędzie, komunikat na pasku stanu gry, ...)?

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?

• Proszę opisać problem z wyświetlaniem. Jeżeli masz zrzut ekranu z tym błędem (dobry zwyczaj) możesz użyć Imgur.com, żeby wrzucić go do Internetu i potem skopiować łącze do niego tutaj.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?

• Proszę skopiować i wkleić tekst wyświetlany w języku angielskim zamiast w twoim języku. Jeżeli masz zrzut ekranu z tym błędem (dobry zwyczaj) możesz użyć Imgur.com, żeby wrzucić go do Internetu i potem skopiować łącze do niego tutaj.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Czy ten tekst jest dostępny w systemie tłumaczeń? Jeśli tak, to czy został przetłumaczony więcej niż 24 godziny temu?

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?

• Wyjaśnij swoją propozycję precyzyjnie i zwięźle, tak aby jak najłatwiej zrozumieć, co masz na myśli.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?