#158362: "Clicking a side pile before a card should not move that card to the side pile"
O czym jest to zgłoszenie?
Co się stało? Wybierz z poniższych opcji
Co się stało? Wybierz z poniższych opcji
Sprawdź, czy istnieje już zgłoszenie na ten sam temat
Jeśli tak, ZAGŁOSUJ na to zgłoszenie. Zgłoszenia z największą liczbą głosów mają najwyższy PRIORYTET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Szczegółowy opis
-
• Proszę skopiować i wkleić treść błędu wyświetloną na ekranie, o ile jakaś się pojawia.
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. -
• Proszę opisać co chciałeś zrobić, co zrobiłeś i co się stało
• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v133
-
• Proszę skopiować i wkleić tekst wyświetlany w języku angielskim zamiast w twoim języku. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Czy ten tekst jest dostępny w systemie tłumaczeń? Jeśli tak, to czy został przetłumaczony więcej niż 24 godziny temu?
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. • Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v133
-
• Wyjaśnij swoją propozycję precyzyjnie i zwięźle, tak aby jak najłatwiej zrozumieć, co masz na myśli.
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. • Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v133
-
• Co wyświetlało się na ekranie kiedy zostałeś zablokowany (Pusty ekran? Część interfejsu gry? Komunikat o błędzie?)
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. • Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v133
-
• Która z zasad gry nie była przestrzegana w adaptacji BGA
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. -
• Czy naruszenie zasad gry jest widoczne w powtórce rozgrywki? Jeżeli tak, to w ruchu o jakim numerze?
• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v133
-
• Jaką akcję w grze chciałeś wykonać?
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. -
• Co starasz się zrobić by uruchomić tę akcję w grze?
-
• Co się stało kiedy próbowałeś to zrobić (komunikat o błędzie, komunikat na pasku stanu gry, ...)?
• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v133
-
• W którym momencie gry pojawił się problem (jakie było aktualne polecenie w grze)?
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. -
• Co się stało kiedy próbowałeś wykonać akcję w grze (komunikat o błędzie, komunikat na pasku stanu gry, ...)?
• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v133
-
• Proszę opisać problem z wyświetlaniem. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. • Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v133
-
• Proszę skopiować i wkleić tekst wyświetlany w języku angielskim zamiast w twoim języku. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Czy ten tekst jest dostępny w systemie tłumaczeń? Jeśli tak, to czy został przetłumaczony więcej niż 24 godziny temu?
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. • Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v133
-
• Wyjaśnij swoją propozycję precyzyjnie i zwięźle, tak aby jak najłatwiej zrozumieć, co masz na myśli.
Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, it moved that card into my side pile.
I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)
This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button. • Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v133
Historia zgłoszeń
Dodaj coś do tego zgłoszenia
- Kolejne ID stołu / ID ruchu
- Czy F5 rozwiązało problem?
- Czy problem zdarzył się kilka razy? Za każdym razem? Losowo?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
