Wszystkie zgłoszenia
Zgłoszenia Great Western Trail: El Paso
#156431: "Ideas for El Paso stats"
inforequest: Programiści chcieliby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat tej propozycji
O czym jest to zgłoszenie?
Co się stało? Wybierz z poniższych opcji
Propozycja: moim zdaniem, następujące rzeczy bardzo poprawiłyby implementację gry
Szczegółowy opis
• Wyjaśnij swoją propozycję precyzyjnie i zwięźle, tak aby jak najłatwiej zrozumieć, co masz na myśli.
Ok, first the basics:
- Deliveries made
- Number of turns played
- Steps moved (sum of the number of steps made each round)
- A rundown of the victory points :
-- Points from cows
-- From buildings
-- From commercial outposts (deliveries)
-- From Bonus tiles
-- From objectives
-- From money at end of game
-- For doing the end game triggering delivery
- Rundown of workers owned at game's end
-- Number of builders
-- cowboys
-- Engineers
-- Jokers
Maybe also:
- Number of permanent certificates
- Number of duplicates allowed (from bonus tiles)
- Total number of objectives
- Total number of bonus tiles
- # of cows in deck
- total number of workers (a bit redundant but it makes the balance workers - cows more explicit)
- # Total number of workers spent on buildings (sum of worker costs of buildings owned at the end)
-- Possibly a rundown of buildings owned (at the end or at some point during the game) or maybe, better yet, how many times they were used for what they are (not for a single auxiliary action). Any of this requires 12 entries though... Obviously, buildings not available during the game (face a or b) are should not be counted and do not impact the average across games.
-- If we go for number of times each building got used, then we might as well do it for neutral buildings too.
-- Number of workers used as engineers during the game (or possibly split between engineers and jokers...)
-- Number of workers used as builders during the game
-- Number of workers used as cowboys during the game
-- Number of Engineers discarded
-- Number of Cowboys discarded
-- Number of Builders discarded
-- Number of Joker workers discarded
-- Number of exchange tokens obtained (or owned throughout the game, which just adds the starting ones)
-- Number of cows removed from game
-- Total money made by discarding cows at buildings
- Hand Size (at game's end)
- Max movement allowed (at game's end without spending cowboys)
-- Possibly some rundown of the improvements of the personal board ? (Like "Cleared circle for cow removal ? etc...)
The list is certainly too long but I love stats...• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v131
Historia zgłoszeń
2025 lut 4 17:23 • Phoxtrot • Ta propozycja nie została jeszcze przeanalizowana przez programistów:
n/a
2025 lut 4 18:17 • firgon • Programiści chcieliby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat tej propozycji:
Lol thank you that's something often underrated by publisher, so i forgot to do it. I will submit this list to publisher.
2025 lut 8 23:42 • Phoxtrot • Programiści chcieliby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat tej propozycji:
If you need to "sell" the idea to the publisher, my main argument is that statistics helps us understand what we did right or wrong which helps us understand what the game can be with a few more plays.
2025 lut 18 4:54 • rRTTNn • Programiści chcieliby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat tej propozycji:
“The list is certainly too long but I love stats...”
me too.
Looking forward to seeing stats implementations!
me too.
Looking forward to seeing stats implementations!
2025 lut 20 9:43 • rRTTNn • Programiści chcieliby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat tej propozycji:
boardgamearena.com/table?table=632925073
1)
# of turns should be (despite of chose objective card):
RTTN 15, Nephaste 15
but in the statistics it shows:
RTTN 14, Nephaste 14
2) usage of Building A is equals to the number of deliverys.
# of uses of building A
RTTN 6, Nephaste 5
but in the statistics it shows:
RTTN 6, Nephaste 6
@firgon
1)
# of turns should be (despite of chose objective card):
RTTN 15, Nephaste 15
but in the statistics it shows:
RTTN 14, Nephaste 14
2) usage of Building A is equals to the number of deliverys.
# of uses of building A
RTTN 6, Nephaste 5
but in the statistics it shows:
RTTN 6, Nephaste 6
@firgon
2025 lut 20 9:43 • rRTTNn • Programiści chcieliby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat tej propozycji:
boardgamearena.com/table?table=632925073
1)
# of turns should be (despite of chose objective card):
RTTN 15, Nephaste 15
but in the statistics it shows:
!!!!!!
RTTN 13, Nephaste 14
!!!!!!
2) usage of Building A is equals to the number of deliverys.
# of uses of building A
RTTN 6, Nephaste 5
but in the statistics it shows:
RTTN 6, Nephaste 6
@firgon
1)
# of turns should be (despite of chose objective card):
RTTN 15, Nephaste 15
but in the statistics it shows:
!!!!!!
RTTN 13, Nephaste 14
!!!!!!
2) usage of Building A is equals to the number of deliverys.
# of uses of building A
RTTN 6, Nephaste 5
but in the statistics it shows:
RTTN 6, Nephaste 6
@firgon
2025 lut 20 10:46 • firgon • Programiści chcieliby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat tej propozycji:
usage of building A is not equals to the number of delivery. sometimes you go to elpaso and can't deliver (use a disc)
2025 lut 20 14:17 • Phoxtrot • Programiści chcieliby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat tej propozycji:
Hum, isn't that still a delivery ?
Perhaps rephrase delivery in the stats to "Disks placed" then ?
Perhaps rephrase delivery in the stats to "Disks placed" then ?
2025 lut 25 0:05 • Phoxtrot • Programiści chcieliby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat tej propozycji:
Currently, a '-' is displayed instead of a 0 if none of the players have used a particular building.
I think it would make more sense to use a '-' only for building that were not available during the game (wrong a/b side).
I think it would make more sense to use a '-' only for building that were not available during the game (wrong a/b side).
2025 mar 13 21:29 • Phoxtrot • Programiści chcieliby uzyskać więcej informacji na temat tej propozycji:
Other stats that could be nice:
- how many times we uses train 1,2,3,4.
Not sure if its worth it to split between 1,2,3,4 and 1*,2*,3*,4*
- how many times we uses train 1,2,3,4.
Not sure if its worth it to split between 1,2,3,4 and 1*,2*,3*,4*
Dodaj coś do tego zgłoszenia
Dodaj tutaj wszystko, co wydaje się istotne dla odtworzenia tego błędu lub zrozumienia twojej propozycji:
- Kolejne ID stołu / ID ruchu
- Czy F5 rozwiązało problem?
- Czy problem zdarzył się kilka razy? Za każdym razem? Losowo?
- Jeżeli masz zrzut ekranu z tym błędem (dobry zwyczaj) możesz użyć Imgur.com, żeby wrzucić go do Internetu i potem skopiować łącze do niego tutaj.
