#118702: "Implement Card Sorting: Either Fixed Sort or Player Sort"
O czym jest to zgłoszenie?
Co się stało? Wybierz z poniższych opcji
Co się stało? Wybierz z poniższych opcji
Sprawdź, czy istnieje już zgłoszenie na ten sam temat
Jeśli tak, ZAGŁOSUJ na to zgłoszenie. Zgłoszenia z największą liczbą głosów mają najwyższy PRIORYTET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Szczegółowy opis
-
• Proszę skopiować i wkleić treść błędu wyświetloną na ekranie, o ile jakaś się pojawia.
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. -
• Proszę opisać co chciałeś zrobić, co zrobiłeś i co się stało
• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Proszę skopiować i wkleić tekst wyświetlany w języku angielskim zamiast w twoim języku. Jeśli posiadasz zrzut ekranu przedstawiający ten błąd (dobra praktyka), możesz skorzystać z wybranej przez siebie usługi hostującej zdjęcia (np. snipboard.io), aby go przesłać, a następnie skopiuj i wklej link tutaj. Czy ten tekst jest dostępny w systemie tłumaczeń? Jeśli tak, to czy został przetłumaczony więcej niż 24 godziny temu?
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. • Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Wyjaśnij swoją propozycję precyzyjnie i zwięźle, tak aby jak najłatwiej zrozumieć, co masz na myśli.
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. • Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Co wyświetlało się na ekranie kiedy zostałeś zablokowany (Pusty ekran? Część interfejsu gry? Komunikat o błędzie?)
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. • Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Która z zasad gry nie była przestrzegana w adaptacji BGA
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. -
• Czy naruszenie zasad gry jest widoczne w powtórce rozgrywki? Jeżeli tak, to w ruchu o jakim numerze?
• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Jaką akcję w grze chciałeś wykonać?
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. -
• Co starasz się zrobić by uruchomić tę akcję w grze?
-
• Co się stało kiedy próbowałeś to zrobić (komunikat o błędzie, komunikat na pasku stanu gry, ...)?
• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v123
-
• W którym momencie gry pojawił się problem (jakie było aktualne polecenie w grze)?
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. -
• Co się stało kiedy próbowałeś wykonać akcję w grze (komunikat o błędzie, komunikat na pasku stanu gry, ...)?
• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Proszę opisać problem z wyświetlaniem. Jeśli posiadasz zrzut ekranu przedstawiający ten błąd (dobra praktyka), możesz skorzystać z wybranej przez siebie usługi hostującej zdjęcia (np. snipboard.io), aby go przesłać, a następnie skopiuj i wklej link tutaj.
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. • Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Proszę skopiować i wkleić tekst wyświetlany w języku angielskim zamiast w twoim języku. Jeśli posiadasz zrzut ekranu przedstawiający ten błąd (dobra praktyka), możesz skorzystać z wybranej przez siebie usługi hostującej zdjęcia (np. snipboard.io), aby go przesłać, a następnie skopiuj i wklej link tutaj. Czy ten tekst jest dostępny w systemie tłumaczeń? Jeśli tak, to czy został przetłumaczony więcej niż 24 godziny temu?
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. • Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Wyjaśnij swoją propozycję precyzyjnie i zwięźle, tak aby jak najłatwiej zrozumieć, co masz na myśli.
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. • Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Google Chrome v123
Historia zgłoszeń
[Clay-/Clay]->[Wood/Wood]->[Wood/Charcoal]->[Charcoal/Charcoal]->[Charcoal/Food]
Dodaj coś do tego zgłoszenia
- Kolejne ID stołu / ID ruchu
- Czy F5 rozwiązało problem?
- Czy problem zdarzył się kilka razy? Za każdym razem? Losowo?
- Jeśli posiadasz zrzut ekranu przedstawiający ten błąd (dobra praktyka), możesz skorzystać z wybranej przez siebie usługi hostującej zdjęcia (np. snipboard.io), aby go przesłać, a następnie skopiuj i wklej link tutaj.
