#117504: "Pudding is incorrectly awards negative points"
O czym jest to zgłoszenie?
Co się stało? Wybierz z poniższych opcji
Co się stało? Wybierz z poniższych opcji
Sprawdź, czy istnieje już zgłoszenie na ten sam temat
Jeśli tak, ZAGŁOSUJ na to zgłoszenie. Zgłoszenia z największą liczbą głosów mają najwyższy PRIORYTET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Szczegółowy opis
-
• Proszę skopiować i wkleić treść błędu wyświetloną na ekranie, o ile jakaś się pojawia.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• Proszę opisać co chciałeś zrobić, co zrobiłeś i co się stało
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Proszę skopiować i wkleić tekst wyświetlany w języku angielskim zamiast w twoim języku. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Czy ten tekst jest dostępny w systemie tłumaczeń? Jeśli tak, to czy został przetłumaczony więcej niż 24 godziny temu?
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Wyjaśnij swoją propozycję precyzyjnie i zwięźle, tak aby jak najłatwiej zrozumieć, co masz na myśli.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Co wyświetlało się na ekranie kiedy zostałeś zablokowany (Pusty ekran? Część interfejsu gry? Komunikat o błędzie?)
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Która z zasad gry nie była przestrzegana w adaptacji BGA
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• Czy naruszenie zasad gry jest widoczne w powtórce rozgrywki? Jeżeli tak, to w ruchu o jakim numerze?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Jaką akcję w grze chciałeś wykonać?
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• Co starasz się zrobić by uruchomić tę akcję w grze?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
-
• Co się stało kiedy próbowałeś to zrobić (komunikat o błędzie, komunikat na pasku stanu gry, ...)?
• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• W którym momencie gry pojawił się problem (jakie było aktualne polecenie w grze)?
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• Co się stało kiedy próbowałeś wykonać akcję w grze (komunikat o błędzie, komunikat na pasku stanu gry, ...)?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Proszę opisać problem z wyświetlaniem. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Proszę skopiować i wkleić tekst wyświetlany w języku angielskim zamiast w twoim języku. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Czy ten tekst jest dostępny w systemie tłumaczeń? Jeśli tak, to czy został przetłumaczony więcej niż 24 godziny temu?
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Wyjaśnij swoją propozycję precyzyjnie i zwięźle, tak aby jak najłatwiej zrozumieć, co masz na myśli.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Jaką masz przeglądarkę?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
Historia zgłoszeń
BGG's interpretation(?):
The player(s) with the least number of pudding cards in their tableau, and any player(s) with no collected pudding cards lose 6 points.
Everyone else's interpretation (as far as I'm aware):
The player with the least number of pudding cards loses 6 points, where having zero pudding cards is considered less than having one pudding card.
As far as I can tell, the "including 0" is just to note that you can't get out of the penalty by "not playing" and avoiding collecting any pudding cards.
The example the rules give is:
> Example: Chris has 4 pudding cards,
> Meredith has 2, and Kerry and Andrew
> have 1. Chris scores 6 points. Kerry and
> Andrew both lose 6 points.
This suggests to me BGA is incorrect, otherwise they're being self-inconsistent by treating 1 vs 0 differently from 2 vs 1.
Your bug has probably been fixed already, or was linked to a temporary failure of BGA service.
In any case, when filling a bug report, make sure to have an explicit title linked to the incident (ex: with error message), so other players can recognize it and vote for it.
Dodaj coś do tego zgłoszenia
- Kolejne ID stołu / ID ruchu
- Czy F5 rozwiązało problem?
- Czy problem zdarzył się kilka razy? Za każdym razem? Losowo?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
